Gather and compare
Bring the source record and supporting documents into the review. Identify missing information, duplicate activity, and differences that need reconciliation.
Financial operations
Ledgerlane
A finance operations workspace for reconciling records, reviewing documents, and keeping approvals and exceptions connected to their source.
Discuss Ledgerlane
PRODUCT FOCUS
Financial records stay connected to the review.
For finance and operations teams reviewing records, reconciling differences, and coordinating approvals across financial systems. Ledgerlane focuses on the source information, the reviewer’s decision, and the activity needed to understand an outcome later.
- 01Record reconciliation
- 02Document review and approvals
- 03Traceable activity history
A record moves through review with its evidence.
Assign and approve
Give each exception an owner and route the proposed resolution through the agreed review. Keep the relevant records and approval authority visible to the reviewer.
Preserve the outcome
Record the approved change, resulting state, and reconciliation context. Define how that outcome is reflected in the source system and available for a later review.
Sources and connections.
Provider interfaces, reconciliation rules, approval authority, record retention, and data access are scoped with your responsible business stakeholders. Commercial terms and implementation responsibilities are discussed against that scope.
Financial source records
Identify the accounting, ERP, or approved provider records involved in the workflow. Supported interfaces, record ownership, and reconciliation rules define the connection scope.
Supporting documents
Choose the invoices, statements, receipts, or other records a reviewer needs. Agree the required fields, document access, and how incomplete information is handled.
Approvals and reporting
Map reviewer roles, approval thresholds, exception routing, and the information needed for reporting. Retention and access requirements are established with the responsible stakeholders.
What the workflow
needs to deliver.
- Review queues linked to financial records and supporting documents
- Reconciliation status with assigned differences and exceptions
- Approval history showing the reviewer, decision, and resulting action
- Reporting records with defined access and retention requirements
Start with one reconciliation or approval workflow.
Bring representative records, the documents used to review them, and the people responsible for approval. We can map the source systems, control requirements, and first workflow before discussing implementation.
- Can the reviewer inspect the source information?
- Does each change follow the agreed approval rules?
- How are duplicates and conflicting records handled?
- Can an authorised person reconstruct the decision later?
Discuss Ledgerlane.
Does Ledgerlane replace our accounting system?
The enquiry starts by identifying which system owns each record. Ledgerlane’s workflow scope is defined around the review, reconciliation, and approvals needed between those systems.
Can it follow our approval process?
We map the roles, thresholds, supporting information, and escalation rules with the people responsible for the process. That review establishes the workflow and the boundaries around each change.
How should document extraction be reviewed?
Required fields, source references, uncertain values, and missing information should be visible to the reviewer. Representative documents are used to define the review and evaluation cases.
What belongs in the activity history?
The source record, proposed change, reviewer, decision, resulting action, and relevant timestamps. The level of detail, retention, and access rules are defined for the workflow.
How do we discuss access and implementation?
Bring one financial workflow, representative records, the source-system interfaces, and the controls your team requires. We can then discuss fit, connection scope, responsibilities, and commercial terms.